Search for: "JUDICIAL WATCH, INCORPORATED"
Results 1 - 20
of 342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2011, 6:50 am
However, as Judicial Watch argued in its Supreme Court petition on behalf of Mr. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 10:33 am
At one time, extreme conservatives reduced it to "judicial activism. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 8:49 am
I am wondering if memes as judicial opinions is a net positive. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Implicit in the revised Principles is an acknowledgement that judges do use social media and that doing so is okay, although there are trouble spots to watch out for. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 6:52 pm
In this age of polarization (exemplified by Judge Kavanaugh's confirmation hearings) is there any constitutional issue that could unite the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, the ACLU, the Chamber of Commerce, the Pacific Legal Foundation, Judicial Watch, the Brennan Center, and the Constitutional Accountability Center (among others)? [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:43 am
(relisted after the January 11 conference; now held) The post Relist Watch appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
But don’t be watching the order list for this case just yet – after relisting it for this Friday’s conference, the court called for the record. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
We at Relist Watch tend to prefer the obscure to the obvious – we like the shadow docket shadowy. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am
Louisiana, 18-5924 Issue: Whether the 14th Amendment fully incorporates the Sixth Amendment guarantee of a unanimous verdict. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am
NAACP, 18-588 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am
Vidal, 18-589 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wi [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am
§ 502 when the Veterans Judicial Reform Act provides the sole avenue for review of the Secretary’s decisions; and (2) whether the U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
John Elwood previews February’s likely relists. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am
John Elwood previews next Monday’s likely relists. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
John Elwood reviews Tuesday’s relists. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 12:19 pm
” Judicial Watch also reached out to CRI but has not received a reply. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:20 am
” The post American Smugglers Recruited by Mexican Cartels Wreak Havoc on Once Tranquil Border Region appeared first on Judicial Watch. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
Davis, 19-6156, involves whether a prisoner’s second federal petition raising a judicial bias claim is “second or successive” under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
We are reposting this edition of “Petitions to watch,” which features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ January 7 conference. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 1:01 pm
The post A “view” from the courtroom: Judicial restraint appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
